It probably looks as though I have dropped off the map, posting-wise for the last month, but I having been steadily working on this project for the past weeks, and I am happy now to bring this series to a close.
I started off trying to summarize, in words and charts, the past eleven parts of this series, but, I found that the resulting effort did not satisfy my original goals very well.
Way back in Part 1, I pointed out that BP presented in their “Statistical Review of World Energy” (hereinafter, BP review), a summary of what they called inter-area movements of petroleum, which just refers to the major imports and exports of oil between different countries or regions of the world.
The trouble with BP's over-complicated presentation was that one couldn’t readily visualize the relative petroleum flows from one region to the next, (i.e., the inter-regional flows). Additionally, even though they published these data every year, no effort was made to describe or depict to what extent these inter-regional flows have been changing over time.
I wanted to simplify the petroleum trade-movement data so that the yearly relative amounts of the major movements between smaller numbers of regions could be easily visualized and projected into the future.
To accomplish this, I animated my analysis of these inter-regional flows. The result is the following two video files.
Trade Movements of Petroleum—the movie
If you get through these two video files, you will have seen over the course of about 20 minutes, +700 power point files, showing the inter-regional flows between these nine regions.
I hope that you find that my efforts were worthwhile.
Part 1 provides some introduction and guidance, and then shows the export and import trends for North America,
South America and European region.
Part 2 starts back up showing the export and import trends for Africa, the Middle East, the former Soviet Union countries, China, Japan, and the remaining Asia-Pacific countries, and ends by showing a combination of major inter-regional petroluem flows for multiple regions combined. (7-7-2012 replacing the videos uploaded directly via blogger with the links to the You Tube videos showing the same) Relative flows from the nine region
Although the time sequences in parts 1 and 2 of these videos nicely shows how petroleum exports have been changing (especially towards
Asia), it is still hard to visualize the total inter-regional flows to and from the nine regions.
Figures 1 and 2 compares, on the same vertical scale, the total inter-regional exports from North America, Europe, China, Japan, and the remaining Asia-Pacific countries (Figure 1) versus exports from South America, Africa, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union countries, and their extrapolated linear trend-lines.
The these two figures make clear, I think, the tiny amount of inter-regional oil exports coming from North America, Europe, China, Japan, and, the vast amount of inter-regional exports coming from the Middle East. Figure 2 also shows that it is the increases in exports from Africa and the former
Soviet Union, that has largely fed the overall increase in global inter-regional exports.
Now, coupling these result with the trends shown in the two videos, and you may start to get a sense of the overall flows of oil exports for the past decade: Middle Eastern inter-regional exports have shifted away from North America, Europe and to some extent,
Japan, towards and the remaining Asia-Pacific regions. The loss in exports from the Middle East to North America, Europe, and Japan, have been made up, mainly, by new inter-regional exports from Africa and the former Soviet Union. China
The receiving side of inter-regional exports is shown in Figures 3 and 4: inter-regional imports to these same regions, and the extrapolated linear trend-lines.
Once again, we see the high dependence of North America, Europe,
China, Japan, and the remaining Asia-Pacific countries (Figure 3) on inter-regional imports, and, a much lower dependence on such imports for South America, Africa, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union countries (Figure 4).
The slopes of the trend lines in Figure 3 help show which regions are increasingly dependent upon these inter-regional imports:
China has the steepest increase, and therefor greatest increasing rate of dependence, followed by the remaining Asia-Pacific region, and then Europe. North America’s import trend has been pretty flat, and ’s is actually trending down. Japan
The increased demand for oil imports for
and remaining Asia-Pacific region likely reflects the economic growth and improved western-style standard of living that these regions have experienced over the last decade. China
But what of
Europe, why such a strong increase in imports? The answer, of course, lays in the fact that Europe's domestic oil production is well past peak and has been falling steeply (see e.g., Figure 2 of Part 6). Even though consumption has declined slighly, Europe’s choice has been to import increasingly large amounts of oil from other regions, in particular from the former Soviet Union. To a large extent, however, these imports have really just been to make-up for the declining imports from the Middle East.
North America, on the other hand, has made-up for the declining imports from the Middle East, and South America, mainly from Africa and the former Soviet Union countries, and from at least slower declines in its petroleum production rates within North America (e.g., from off-shore, tar sands and fracking), as compared to Europe.
The trend for
to be importing less oil, of course, is not due to substantial increases in domestic production, which is next to nil. Rather, I suspect that the decline reflects the demographics trends in Japan with it increasing aging and retiring population. Japan
Future export and import trends
It should be pretty obvious from Figures 1-4, and the videos, that the overall trend for the past decade has been for increasing inter-regional exports/imports.
Will this continue, as suggested by the trend-lines, for the next decade and beyond?
I do have my doubts that the trend for increasing rates of exports can be sustained for another decade, especially for the larger exporting regions like Africa, the Middle East, and the former
Soviet Union countries. Further increases in production rate to support an ever-increasing rate of exports seems doubtful to me. As an example, consider the former Soviet Union countries, which would have to increase its exports and therefore domestic production rates by ~2 bby (from its present total production rate of 5 bby) over the next decade to continue the last decade's export trend. Maybe arctic oil and decreased domestic consumption could help continue the trend—but we will see. Similarly, where will Africa come up with another ~1 bby (from its present total production rate of ~3.7 bby) to continue its increasing export trend over the next decade?
One trend that I think that is more likely continue, is the change in the distributions of exports between these regions. For instance, I think that it is likely that greater proportions of Middle Eastern exports will continue to be directed to
and the remaining Asia-Pacific region, even if the absolute amount of exports from this region stays flat or declines in the future. Similarly, the trend for greater proportions of exports from former Soviet Union countries to North America, China Japan, and the remaining Asia-Pacific region, is a trend that I think will continue, even if the absolute amount of exports from this region decline in the future. But, this is a topic for a future post. If these exports trends do continue, it will greatly impact how these different regions will fare in an era of declining oil production. China
At 67 single-spaced pages of analysis, 146 figures, and now, a 20 minute +700 slide video, this turned out to be one whooper of a series. Next, I plan to use these data to better predict future regional petroleum consumption patterns, in an expanded and enhanced version of my previous effort.